Demo dashboard · read-only

What AI assistants cite for health questions

Built from the same pipeline as the health citations study. The page is rebuilt from the pipeline’s export, so no number here is typed by hand. Definitions and limits are on the method page.

Last updated 2026-09-19 · run 1 · assistants: ChatGPT (gpt-5.5) · runs so far: 1. Trend lines appear when the second scheduled run lands.

Questions

45

of 50 planned · 3 languages · 2 repeats

Answers

238

of 300 calls · 62 failed

Cited links

747

87% of answers cite

Stability

44%

source overlap between repeats

Medicine documents

30

links to EMA and leaflet pages

Explore the data

Pick a market, a question type or a source. Every number is recounted from the rows, and the list below shows the questions and links behind it.

Market
Question type
Source type

747 cited links in 206 answers to 43 questions

Share by source type

  • Public health bodies
    60%
  • Patient and professional orgs
    23%
  • Journals and research
    13%
  • Hospitals and health publishers
    2.9%
  • Unclassified
    1.2%
  • Press
    0.3%

Top sources

Select a source to see where it was cited.

Evidence: the answers behind these numbers

The full answer text and the raw API response are stored for every row. They are not published here, because this site gives no medical advice.

Where the links go, per market

Share of cited links by source type. Same scale in every row.

  • Public health bodies
  • Patient and professional orgs
  • Journals and research
  • Hospitals and health publishers
  • Other
Germany241 links · 49% on national domains
Denmark233 links · 64% on national domains
United Kingdom273 links · 71% on national domains
All markets747 links
Other = pharma company sites, Wikipedia, press, forums and links with no source type yet. Exact numbers per type are in the table below.

Citation rate

Share of answers that cite the source type at least once.

  • Public health bodies
    74%
  • Patient and professional orgs
    45%
  • Journals and research
    24%
  • Hospitals and health publishers
    7.1%
  • Unclassified
    2.9%
  • Press
    0.8%

Top cited sources, all markets

Share of all cited links.

  • nhs.uk
    14%
  • sundhed.dk
    11%
  • nih.gov
    6.7%
  • diabetes.org.uk
    5.6%
  • nice.org.uk
    5.0%
  • europa.eu
    4.0%
  • gesundheitsinformation.de
    3.5%
  • bund.de
    2.7%
  • hjerteforeningen.dk
    2.7%
  • cdc.gov
    2.5%

1.2% of links have no source type yet. They are kept in the data and shown in the table below.

Company share of voice

13 pharma and device company names were searched for in 238 answers. None was named. For consumer health questions, the assistant talks about conditions and institutions, not companies. Product names are deliberately not tracked here.

Table view

Source typeDEDKGBAll
Public health bodies52%62%64%60%
Patient and professional orgs28%21%21%23%
Journals and research14%14%11%13%
Hospitals and health publishers4.6%2.1%2.2%2.9%
Pharma company sites0%0%0%0%
Wikipedia0%0%0%0%
Press0.8%0%0%0.3%
Forums and social media0%0%0%0%
Unclassified0.8%0%2.6%1.2%

Data: citations.csv · summary.json. This dashboard reports which sources assistants cite. It gives no medical advice and makes no claims about any company’s products.